Thursday, May 31, 2012

Ferreum, Ferroux, Ferrienne

VIMEO videos by Afiq Omar 

1.Ferreum
I combined exotic ferrofluid along with metallic objects around the house to craft various footage that demonstrate the properties of ferromagnetism. Shot on a 5D with the amazing 100mm f2.8 L Macro and cut on Adobe Premiere Pro.


2. Ferroux
Second installation of my ongoing series focused on analog visual effects, understanding fluid dynamics, magnetism & natural invisible forces. This time around I experimented with mixing tiny portions of ferrofluid & other chemicals, soap, alcohol, milk etc. Not for the trypophobic for sure.


3. Ferrienne
Ferienne is the third installment of an ongoing experimental study on fluid dynamics, magnetism and cymatics. These invisible forces of nature are then made visible through various liquids and mixtures, and they form patterns that are otherwise invisible to the naked eye. I then manipulated these patterns to compose analog visual effects & using simple editing techniques, create motion graphics that are natural and organic. The basis of it remains simple; to create visually engaging images that are unique and can never be repeated.

I focused more on achieving clean and precise images this time around using a massive amount of material collected over the past 8 weeks. The colour palette was kept similar to that of the human skin, and the textures were manipulated using different backgrounds, further pushing the limits of trypophobia; the fear of holes.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Poetry Wednesday:I'm So Busy

I'm So Busy 
by P G Wodehouse



I always said
That the man I would wed
Must be one who would work all the time.
One with ambition,
Who'd make it his mission
To win a position sublime.
One whose chief pleasure would be
Making a fortune for me;
One who would toil all the day
Down in the market and say:

Lizzie, Lizzie,
I'm so busy,
Don't know what to do.
Goodbye dear, I'm off to the street.
Can't stop now,
I'm cornering wheat.
I shall keep on till I'm dizzy,
Till the deal goes through.
Lizzie, I'm so busy,
I'm making a pile for you.
- - - -  - - - - - - - - --
Don't be deceived,
If you've ever believed
That my taste for hard labor is small.
Stifle the lurking
Idea that I'm shirking,
I never stop working at all.
I may have loafed in the past,
But I am busy at last,
I've found employment and I'm
Working away all the time.

Lizzie, Lizzie,
I'm so busy,
Busy loving you.
That's the job that suits me the best,
Though I never get any rest.
I shall keep on till I'm dizzy
But I shan't get through.
Lizzie, I'm so busy,
So won't you get busy too?
- - - - - - - - - - - -

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

A Brief History of Four Letter Words

From io9.com

"Scumbag," sounds like the kind of hokey insult that would get you laughed at if you used it. When it was used in a New York Times, it got protests from some older readers, because once upon a time it meant "a used condom." Think about every time you've seen Batman refer, in children's cartoon, to criminals as scum, and you'll begin to understand how obscenity evolves.

There are people who say that animals swear when they, for example, growl or gesture aggressively at people. Although no one could mistake such things for friendly gestures, showing anger isn't the same thing as swearing. Swearing is more complicated than just aggression. Swearing can be a form of affectionate teasing among friends, it can be a way of insulting someone, it can be a way of letting off steam or frustration, or a way of showing unbridled enthusiasm. The only thing all verbal obscenity has in common is the deliberate crossing of social norms. And this is why swear words are always changing.

The Newly Innocent Obscenities

Golly! Zounds! Gadzooks! These are the kind of things Captain Marvel would say. Almost any other superhero would be too mature for such, childish silly words. And yet, during Shakespeare's time, they made him one of the more edgy writers out there. They're not just random sounds, but contractions, meant to make absolutely shocking sentiments less outright obscene. Golly, zounds, and gadzooks were, in order, god's body, god's wounds, and god's hocks. While thinking about the Almighty's ham hock region might offend a few people, each of these words are the kind of things now deemed perfectly innocent. This shows a huge shift in social mores since the time of the Shakespeare.

Religious obscenities, when half of Europe was at war with the other half over the right way to practice Christianity, were a big deal. Referring to God in the corporeal sense was a way to scandalize people. To take the Lord's name in vain was to go against explicit Biblical instructions. These were some of the more obscene concepts of the age, but today are the most mild swear words most people can think of. God, hell, damn, and, to some extent, Jesus Christ, are no big deal anymore. Most people use them.

Ironically, the reason they got a toe hold in current society is the same reason they were so scandalous a few centuries ago. They could be genuine swear words, but they could also be expressions of religious ideas. Far, far back in Simpsons history, there was a storyline about how the kids got a lesson on hell in Sunday School. When asked, afterwards, about what they learned, Bart replied, "Hell." When Marge scolded him, he told her that, no, they had learned about the literal hell, and kept saying hell over and over until Marge, tired of hearing a word she considered inappropriate when coming out of her son's mouth, said, "Bart, you're not in church anymore. Don't swear." The line between actual devotion and blasphemy is tougher to delineate than most censors, and most people, imagine. Eventually most English speakers just stopped trying to find it at all, and people saying things like, "Mother of God," just became a noncontroversial emotional outburst.

The Animals Diverge From Their Excrement

Other swear words, which managed to skate into acceptability under a protective barrier of literalism, are bitch and ass. Both of those started out as literal meanings - animals - and might have been used as insults in their own right in their time. Ass is actually two words blended together to become an obscenity. Ass, the swear word, started out as irs, which meant the back end of anything, not just animals. Over time it became arse, and eventually rounded out and emerged as an ass. The two words were so alike that it was easy to sneak some ass into everyday life. Who remembers the West Wing characters constantly calling each other "jackass," which, being a donkey, was perfectly okay. In the next few years the first part of the word was peeled away, with the understanding that an ass still meant donkey, but eventually everyone stopped kidding themselves and allowed it to be another mild swear word regularly said on TV.

Bitch started out, and remains, a female dog in breeding condition. From there its meaning expanded to anything female in breeding condition, and eventually it expanded to become promiscuous women, angry women, angry or promiscuous homosexual men, or anything "especially disagreeable." Sliding between the slightly sexual, the slightly referring to sexuality, and the literal meaning of the word got bitch into general conversation, and most television shows. It also helps that being "especially disagreeable," rather than meek and accommodating has become a point of pride for both women and male homosexuals, and so even at its most insulting, the word has lost the power to shock as society has moved on.

As for things like pissing and shitting, which is what bitches, asses, and all other animals do, they're old English words. At least one of which dates back to the King James Bible. (2 Ki 18:27 But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?) These words, though not refined back then, have gotten both more abstract and a little more outré. This is an example of the way culture can continually reach for more delicacy. In France, "toilet" used to mean a small towel, which was kept near the chamber pot. It also meant the act of cleansing oneself. Old books often use the phrase, "She spent some time making her toilet," which means grooming and preparing oneself for an event. "Toilet water" was a kind of light perfume. Since these actions happened in private, near a chamber pot, they were used as a euphemism for actually using that chamber pot. Eventually, the word came to mean the actual toilet itself, and not the things near it. After that, saying "I need to go to the toilet," became indelicate, and people had to come up with more abstracted ways of saying the same thing. Cycles like this made piss and shit, while more commonly used in society, more vulgar than they originally were.

Four Letters and Starting With F

And then there's the swear word that's held steady for half a millennium; fuck. It seemed to spring upon the landscape fully-formed, and already an obscenity. The first instance of use of the word "fuck," came from a satirical poem, written in Latin, in the year 1500. The line is referring to a group of friars, and runs like this: "Non sunt in coeli, quia gxddbov xxkxzt pg ifmk." If it suddenly starts looking like Kryptonian instead of Latin after the word quia, it's because it had to be written in code. Each letter of the word was swapped out for the letter following it in the alphabet. Remember that the alphabet was in a different order back then, and that Latin conjugates verbs differently, but gxddbov translates as "fuccant." The overall line states, "They are not in Heaven, since they fuck the wives of Ely." That is one racy poem!

The word was, and continued to be, the big daddy of all swear words in English for many years. It became one of the words that kept Lady Chatterley's Lover banned in plenty of places. The word was unutterable in polite company. It's still banned from most television stations and most print media.

Still, it has always been used, and its increasing popularity means that it's becoming less likely to be held back from media discourse. Lately things have been changing especially fast. The FCC lately had to change regulations about fining news stations that aired spontaneous utterings of "fuck," in their news footage. It was found that the word has come to be something people use to express their frustration, instead of solely referring to sex. Frustration is not obscene, so it's highly likely that fuck may be sliding its way into generally and even media acceptability. As soon as the word acquires tones that aren't exactly the literal and obscene meaning that it was originally used to convey, censors relax. They have to. As we've seen, it's too easy to play with language, hiding deeper meanings behind compound words, resetting context, and making words seem innocent. Is it only a matter of time before five hundred years of dirtiness becomes sanitized as a mere expression of frustration? And if so, what to do we say then?

Monday, May 28, 2012

SpaceX Dragon: The Space Capsule That Just Made History


Elon Musk's spacecraft manufacturing company SpaceX made history on 05/25/2012 at 9:56 a.m. ET, when its Dragon capsule was captured by the International Space Station's robotic arm. The vessel berthed at the ISS at 12:12 p.m. ET.

DragonX is the first privately owned space vessel to berth at the International Space Station.

Musk, a co-founder of PayPal, began the SpaceX Dragon capsule project way back in 2005 and developed the craft in four and a half years for about $300 million.

According to SpaceX's site, the Dragon capsule is 20 feet in length, weighs about 9,260 lbs and can carry up to 13,228 lbs to low-earth orbit or up to seven passengers. In December 2008, the project secured $3.1 billion in funding from NASA for a contract of 12 flight missions or more.

Dragon is a free-flying, reusable spacecraft being developed by SpaceX under NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program. Initiated internally by SpaceX in 2005, the Dragon spacecraft is made up of a pressurized capsule and unpressurized trunk used for Earth to LEO transport of pressurized cargo, unpressurized cargo, and/or crew members.

The Dragon spacecraft is comprised of 3 main elements: the Nosecone, which protects the vessel and the docking adaptor during ascent; the Spacecraft, which houses the crew and/or pressurized cargo as well as the service section containing avionics, the RCS system, parachutes, and other support infrastructure; and the Trunk, which provides for the stowage of unpressurized cargo and will support Dragon’s solar arrays and thermal radiators.

In December 2008, NASA announced the selection of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 launch vehicle and Dragon spacecraft to resupply the International Space Station (ISS) when the Space Shuttle retires. The $1.6 billion contract represents a minimum of 12 flights, with an option to order additional missions for a cumulative total contract value of up to $3.1 billion.

Though designed to address cargo and crew requirements for the ISS, as a free-flying spacecraft Dragon also provides an excellent platform for in-space technology demonstrations and scientific instrument testing. SpaceX is currently manifesting fully commercial, non-ISS Dragon flights under the name “DragonLab”. DragonLab represents an emergent capability for in-space experimentation.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Kevin Smith Riffs on Spoilers

Kevin Smith Riffs on Spoilers, His New Show for Movie Geeks
Interview at Wired.com


Kevin Smith likes to talk. He’ll riff for hours on pretty much anything — comics, farting, hockey, Bruce Willis, the general state of the internet. But mostly he likes to talk about movies. A lot. With people. And with his new series Spoilers, that’s pretty much all he has to do.

The show, which will premiere June 4 on Hulu, will showcase Smith and 50 die-hard movie fans right after they’ve seen a big blockbuster movie on opening night, creating a monster gab-fest full of opinions, fights and — because it’s a Smith endeavor — plenty of gags and a bit of Jason Mewes (the Jay to Smith’s Silent Bob).

“Who doesn’t have something to say in this day and age? Everybody wants a platform — social media is all about, ‘I have an opinion and here it is!’”

The Spoilers audience will consist of fans who sign up through a website, launching Monday, and request the movie they want to see. Filming will take place at Smith’s new SModCo Studios on the Universal Studios CityWalk in Hollywood, where the attendees will watch the movies.

Putting butts in seats is the least of Smith’s worries about the show. “It’s going be easy to fill those slots, but the trick, of course, is filling them with people who have something to say,” the Clerks director said in a phone interview with Wired. “But who doesn’t have something to say in this day and age? Everybody wants a platform — social media is all about, ‘I have an opinion and here it is!’”

Harder than finding an audience for the show and getting them talking, though, will be keeping the ever-verbose Smith and his similarly passionate fans from going on too long and keeping their language in the realm of what can be said on network television (the standard that Hulu shows follow). Zak Knutson, the Chop Shop production company co-founder who will be editing the show, already warned Smith to keep it brief.

“He was like, ‘Look motherfucker. This is not one of those shows you can do for three hours and expect me to cut down to half an hour and deliver it to Hulu in the schedule we’ve got,’” Smith said.

Wired got on the phone with Smith to get the spoilers on Spoilers, which will begin with a 10-episode season and go up each Monday on Hulu and Hulu Plus. In the process, naturally, we got much more than that. Read on to get the geek auteur’s thoughts on Star Wars pen pals, having sway on the internet, and his aspirations for sucking Bill Murray’s dick. (Metaphorically speaking, of course).

Kevin Smith: Thank you! That, to me, was such a big win because as much as I love watching those dudes — you gotta realize Bryan and Walter are two of my dearest friends in the world, and I’ve always thought they were hysterically funny — so to be able to fucking turn on not just TV but AMC and see those dudes on TV? For six times I kept telling myself, like, “If they only do it six times, count your blessings, don’t bitch. Even if you don’t go to Season 2, you struck gold.” This never happens — people don’t turn to you and say, “Let’s do a TV show about your friends.” Then when they said, “Hey, we’re going to do Season 2,” I was just like, “Oh my god legitimacy! True legitimacy!” It was really neat, so I appreciate that.

“I got one of those long stick mics from the ’70s, like a Donahue-type mic, and I’m getting in everyone’s face like, ‘What did you think?’ When you turn the mic on the audience it’s pure gold.”

Wired: You’re becoming something of a force in TV now.

Smith: That led to this show [Spoilers]. Because, here’s what I learned doing Comic Book Men: When I pitched it, it was like, “It’s Pawn Stars in a comic book store.” And the spine was always going to be transactions — people coming in with stuff and Walter deciding whether to buy it or not. And what was learned when we aired the shows was the will-he-won’t-he-buy-it? — people didn’t care about that. It didn’t matter. What they loved was just seeing the thing come in and seeing the conversation that it kickstarted. So with Spoilers I was like, “OK, man, let’s take the notion of what we, those of us who really love movies, do online afterward — we go and we chitchat about it on an internet forum. Let’s take it and do it live.”

Being on Talking Dead, man, is a real eye-opener because it was like, “This counts? This TV show just happened and this TV show is about the TV show that just happened? This is amazing!” So, let’s take all this that we’ve learned, or what I did with the Red State tour, or what I’ve been doing for years, which is showing a movie and then having a Q&A afterward — let’s take all that stuff and put it into Spoilers. The notion is: Watch the movie with everybody, we take them out and pay for them to go see the movie, kick back — on opening day, none of this early bullshit, ain’t doing it like those critics, doing it legit — and then just go down the street, sit down and have a gabfest, man.

I got one of those long stick mics from the ’70s, like a Donahue-type mic, and I’m getting in everyone’s face like, “What did you think?” Instead of co-hosts in a movie-reviews show where you’ve got a fat guy and a skinny guy saying “yes” or “no,” it’s a fat guy and 50 other people. It’s not the normal constant. I was forced to watch Donahue as a kid. My grandmother would be like, “Oh, my Donahue is on.” The first half of it was painful because it was like pundits and windbags talking to each other. But what I loved when I tuned in was when he turned the mic on the audience. Because the whole time he’s up there, you see people in the audience shaking their heads and they’ve gotta get something off their chests, they don’t agree. And when you turn the mic on the audience it’s pure gold.

Wired: Especially movie geeks.

“I’ll have on my friend Malcolm Ingram, who hates everything. He’s one of these nihilists. If it’s popular he can’t stand it. He represents the internet.”
Smith: I figure, if I’m sitting down with movie fans who just watched a movie? These cats are going to be electric. I don’t need a co-host — I’m going to have 50 different co-hosts every week. That’s just for the first half of the show. Then we’ll get into the segments and stuff we do.

Wired: What’s the format? What kind of segments can fans expect from Spoilers?

Smith: We’re going to do a beat called Movie Goon where like I’ll have on my friend Malcolm Ingram, who hates everything. He’s one of these nihilists. If it’s popular, he can’t stand it. He represents the internet. So we’ll bring him on and let him have his say and then we’ll beat him up verbally and tell him why he’s wrong — have a good old-fashioned debate.

We’re going to do a bit called Criterion Corner, where we sit around and geek out over the library and talk about flicks that maybe people don’t know about. There’s so many titles in the Criterion Collection now that people don’t even know them all. We’re doing cartoons as well. We’ll be doing a Hollywood Babble-On cartoon.

Segment four is Icon Interviews, where we sit somebody down in the chair and gush over them. Grab a Stan Lee, or if we’re lucky, get man-of-the-moment Joss Whedon. Plop them down in what we call the “high chair” — it’s like a throne. We modeled it off the Conan throne. We just sit there and I Q&A with them, and then I turn it over to the audience and let them Q&A as well.

Then we’ll end with a little Jason Mewes bit as well. He’s excited to be the bit guy. We’ve got this bit we do in the live show called “Let Us Act,” where we pull people from the audience and they do scenes from movies with Mewes, so we’re going to do some of that.

Wired: You’ve done movies, podcasts, a TV show and countless other things. Why do a web show on Hulu?

Smith: To me it’s like, go where you got the juice. And where do I have the most juice in this world? It ain’t multiplexes — it’s online. Online I’ve got some sway. I’m like Lawnmower Man in that movie, I’m god here! You take me offline and in the real world I’m a fat, schlubby idiot. There it makes more sense for me, rather than be like, “Hey everybody! Close your computer and turn on your television!” It’s way easier for me to go on Twitter and drop a link and say, “Here’s the latest episode of Spoilers — go watch it at your convenience.”

Wired: It seems like more directors and actors are headed to web series these days, right?

“When I first got in the movie business people were like, ‘Ew, TV.’ Right now the internet is in the same place TV was when I started in film.”

Smith: When I first got in the movie business people were like, “Ew, TV.” Like, they ghetto-ized it. Now TV is this dominant medium and film people look at it and go, “Man, I want to do a TV show.” Right now the internet is in the same place TV was when I started in film. Everybody’s got a laptop. The fluidity between online and networks, it exists. Hulu is owned by a couple networks, so obviously the networks are very much alive and well. I watch my 30 Rock episodes on Hulu anyway and I know there are a lot of people like me. If I’m one of those cats and open up my Hulu and there’s 30 Rock and right next to it is Spoilers? What do I fucking know? It could be on some channel I’m unaware of. I’m just watching the show and then I’m like, “Oh it’s a Hulu original. Go figure.” There’s fluidity now. Nobody cares. There’s no difference now between what is a TV show and what is not.

Comic Book Men, when it ran on AMC, only ran in the U.S., but meanwhile on Twitter I would say 25 percent of my reaction came from people who were overseas who can’t possibly watch it except to BitTorrent or grab it on Usenet. So if they’re already doing that? Shit man, why am I wasting my time going over here, converting it, and then hoping that they catch up with it online when I can simply give them a link and say, “I’ll be over here on Hulu waiting for you any time you’re ready for me.” Create content, leave it there. No more of this, “Let’s spend a shit-ton of money to make sure they come on opening weekend!” That’s a fool’s errand unless you have The Avengers in your back pocket.

Wired: Speaking of Avengers, is Spoilers just going to focus on geek and genre pictures, or will you also throw in the random rom-com or indie film?

“I think you might be able to pull it off with [thought-provoking] movies like, ‘Oh my god, The King’s Speechwho knew?!’ Even like, ‘Oh my god the movie with Fassbender, his dick saves it!’”

Smith: We’re going to launch in the summer blockbuster season, so that gives us our pick of the litter of big, fun movies. But I’m a comedy guy, so we’ll mix those in there, and I’m an indie guy, so we’re going to try to mix those in there as well. But we know for a fact, god willing, if we’re lucky enough to go for a second season, if we launch a second season it would be Oscar season so we would have to do a different kind of Spoilers, where we’re looking at these thought-provoking pictures and stuff. Movies are movies, at the end of the day. Even Ordinary People is fun to talk about in a room, if you get enough different personalities talking about it. I think it’s possible to pull it off even with movies that aren’t like, “Oh my god The Avengers, wasn’t that cool?!” or “Oh my god The Dark Knight Rises, wasn’t that amazing?!” or “Oh my god Prometheus!” I think you might be able to pull it off with movies like, “Oh my god, The King’s Speech, who knew?!” Even like, “Oh my god the movie with Fassbender, his dick saves it!” You’ll get content out of it.

That’s the beauty of sitting down with 50 different personalities. While you’re shooting it, anything goes, man. One of them could knife me, you know what I’m saying? We’re sitting there getting so passionate about the back and forth — they don’t like the movie and I do and suddenly it’s like, “Aaahhh!” Hopefully we’ll have a metal detector and that won’t happen.

Wired: It’s not a good argument unless it comes to blows.

Smith: I’ll take a punch in the name of movies. Some people say I owe movies a punch or two based on Cop Out and Jersey Girl. I’ll take those punches.

Wired: So is this your chance to be a movie critic after being subjected to them for so long?

Smith: Film criticism became very, you know, yes-or-no, black-and-white, thumbs-up-thumbs-down kind of affair. You don’t really see movies handled by “professionals” on TV the way they’re handled on the internet. That’s where you see people just love on a movie. So, I’m like, “Let’s do that version.”

“I’ll never be a guy who’s just like, ‘It’s bullshit! It sucks! It’s the worst!’ I know what goes in to making a movie.”

Before I was a moviemaker, I was a movie lover. And I would sit around and watch At the Movies and Sneak Previews because A) I was a kid and I wanted to see clips of the movies that were coming, but B) These were the only two people in the world who talked about movies like they were important. They were the proto-geeks, the proto-internet — Siskel and Ebert — who talked about movies with such enthusiasm that it made you feel like, “Oh my god, this is as important as watching the evening news.” And it is. Movies are as important as watching the evening news because the evening news is so fucking depressing. You need a movie to escape.

For years I was just a movie lover and then for this weird, wonderful period of time I was a moviemaker. So that gives you this different insight into the process where, I’ll never be a guy who’s just like, “It’s bullshit! It sucks! It’s the worst!” I know what goes into making a movie. I know nobody sets out to make a bad movie. At least I’ll be able to bring some sensibility to it, having done it. For years, you were always able to throw at a critic, “Yeah? What does your movie look like?” So now, I’ve got a bunch of movies under my belt, so I can go out there and talk about movies in a judicious way. Plus, you stick around long enough, they give you chairman emeritus status on anything. I’ve been in the movie business 20 years, and even if I suck at the job, they’re like, “He’s been around, he’s an expert.”

“I would love to suck Bill Murray’s dick in that way that I do — not the actual dick-in-mouth version, but the verbal, ‘Oh my god, without you I wouldn’t be who I am!’ way.”
Wired: Do you have any dream guests for the show?

Smith: I can talk to absolutely anybody. But in the world of people that I would just love to sit there and be like, “Let me ask you this! Let me ask you this! Let me love you about this and let this audience do the same.” I think an ultimate get for me — and we’ll never get him — Bill Murray. This is going to sound weird, but I would love to suck Bill Murray’s dick in that way that I do — not the actual dick-in-mouth version, but the verbal, “Oh my god, without you I wouldn’t be who I am!” way. That’s the people I gravitate toward, who without their art I don’t think I would have gravitated toward mine.

It’s much easier to go to people I know I can get. I know I can turn to Edgar Wright and say, “Dude, let’s sit down and talk about Scott Pilgrim. Because this audience will still love talking about Scott Pilgrim. Let’s talk about Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz.” With Stan [Lee], it’s obviously easy because you have a lifetime to talk about. But I look forward to talking to cats that I don’t know that well, but I know their work and kind of dig it, like Gerard Way. I want to sit down Gerard Way and be like, “Dude, you could get so much pussy, why do you bother writing comic books?

Smith: When Clerks came out — and I’m not saying “I did this fucking first!” — but when Clerks came out nobody was talking about Star Wars anymore. Star Wars were three movies that happened and they were done and we had moved on as culture. George Lucas hadn’t started talking about, “I’m going to do this again!” So when I talked about Star Wars in Clerks, it was this weird moment because that’s what me and my friends would do. So Clerks plays at Sundance — but that’s in America and when the movie plays there, people talk about Star Wars, people are like, “Yeah, yeah, I remember Star Wars.”

When I went to Cannes and I sat down with a French journalist, and this was the first time I’d went overseas with the movie. I’m sitting down with a dude who doesn’t speak very good English, but I don’t speak any French whatsoever so it doesn’t matter, and he’s measuring his words so carefully so as to not sound like he doesn’t know English and this is what he says, “Uh, Jay and, uh, Bob ….” I say, “Silent Bob.” He says, “Yes.” Then, “They are R2-D2 and C-3PO, no?” And suddenly I was like, “What?! How do you know Star Wars?” And I realized that’s what we share. Everywhere people wanted to talk about it.

This generation, that would be The Avengers or the Harry Potter series or something like that. But the birth of pop culture was right at that moment. But the sad thing is it will eventually go away. Now it’s hard because everybody does it. It was easier for me, back in the day. Even in Clerks 2 I had to transition from talking about Star Wars to talking about Lord of the Rings. If I talked about Lord of the Rings now people would be like, “What is this, 2000? Move on!” Now if you want to pop culture riff you’ve gotta do Avengers, Hunger Games, stuff like that.

“I joined the Star Wars Fan Club and got me a pen pal. I had this dude up in Alberta, Canada, who I would write back and forth to about Star Wars.”

Wired: Do you think the rise of Star Wars fandom as it is, and the plethora of pop-culture references to it, coincides with the rise of the internet?

Smith: When I was a kid there was no fuckin’ internet, so if you wanted to talk to somebody about Star Wars you had to write a letter to Starlog and hope it got published. Or, like I did, I joined the Star Wars Fan Club and got me a pen pal. I had this dude up in Alberta, Canada, who I would write back and forth to about Star Wars. I always compare it to what I guess it’s like for gay dudes when they had to go into a public restroom back in the day — tap the foot on the floor to try and see who is interested. Back then, man, you would write to a guy — a stranger in another country — and be like, “Do you like Boba Fett’s jetpack?” and hope he’d write back.

Now, man, you can commune with people without communing with them. We can talk to strangers about the things we’re passionate about. And things that would never have fan bases can build fan bases. If there was no internet, my career would’ve been over years ago. But what I can do is put people in touch with one another. Here’s a dude over in Alaska who likes me, and a chick in Florida who likes me, and now they’ve fucking met through a website and you become a conduit. So thank god for the internet, it allows somebody like me to kind of thrive. Otherwise, short attention spans and costly budgets would’ve kept me from getting an audience together years and years ago. I would’ve been out on my ass.

Friday, May 25, 2012

The Cost of an Alien Invasion


 By Jordan Zakarin, Hollywood Reporter

The wreckage in Midtown Manhattan, all told, would top the financial carnage of 9/11, Hurricane Katrina and the Japanese tsunami.

Just as it has been for centuries of immigrants and desperately lost, subway map-reading tourists, New York City is a favorite destination for angry, carnage-minded mutants, monsters and aliens -- though they intend to destroy the city's landmarks, not capture them in Instagram photos.

The latest invaders are the Chitauri, the shape-shifting aliens that descend upon Manhattan in the climactic battle in The Avengers. And with their starships and smaller, strikingly Kawasaki Jet Ski-like racers, they certainly succeed in wreaking havoc on the city. To walk out of a screening of the movie into the light of Park Avenue is a shock, with its clean streets and undented skyline, so to get a sense of just how much damage the Chitauri would have caused had the film been real life, The Hollywood Reporter reached out to Kinetic Analysis Corp., one of the leading disaster-cost prediction and assessment firms in the nation.
 
In an exclusive report for THR, KAC, led by Chuck Watson and Sara Jupin, employed computer models used for predicting the destruction of nuclear weapons and concluded that the physical damage of the invasion would be $60 billion-$70 billion, with economic and cleanup costs hitting $90 billion. Add on the loss of thousands of lives, and KAC puts the overall price tag at $160 billion.
 

For context, the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks cost $83 billion, Hurricane Katrina cost $90 billion, and the tsunami in Japan last year washed away $122 billion. 
 
Although many buildings in the fight's East Midtown arena suffered extensive structural damage, most were limited to the more superficial destruction of windows, facade and some interiors. Those buildings that had their tops crushed, though, would be especially costly and time-consuming to fix, as would be Grand Central Station, through which a warship crashed.
 
"The extensive damage to Grand Central Terminal could prove highly disruptive, depending on the subsurface damage to the subway system," KAC notes. "Although such damage is unlikely, as the 9/11 events showed, collapsing buildings can cause significant damage to subsurface infrastructure such as gas, communications and electrical systems. Detailed site surveys will be required to assess the state of the subterranean infrastructure."
 
KAC also predicts that liability would be a major issue. Who, exactly, will have to pay for the damage? S.H.I.E.L.D., they note, is likely protected as a government agency, though probes eventually will look into its role in predicting, preventing and responding to the invasion -- just as they looked into the Ghostbusters.
 

"Most insurance policies have special provisions for acts of war, civil unrest or terrorism," KAC adds. "Given the involvement of individuals considered deities in some cultures (Thor, Loki), there is even the potential to classify the event as an 'act of God,' though that designation would be subject to strenuous theological and legal debate."
 
Watson said he was surprised by a lower-than-expected total. "Compared to the aliens in Independence Day, for example, these guys were amateurs," he told THR. "Of course, the Chitauri/Loki alliance were more interested in conquest and ruling, whereas the ID aliens were just looking for lunch or something."
 

Still, with a $700 million two-week gross to protect, Marvel and Disney are lucky all the damage happened onscreen.
 
Chitauri Invasion of New York City 
Post Event Damage Estimate (Created by KAC R&D)

Summary
The May 4th, 2012 invasion by the Chitauri through an inter-dimensional portal caused significant damage to the New York City area. As with past natural, anthropogenic, and unnatural catastrophes, it often takes months or years to generate an accurate damage and loss estimate. Using sophisticated computer models, Kinetic Analysis Corporation (KAC) can provide damage forecasts days or even weeks ahead of time for events that can be anticipated or hypothesized (hurricanes, winter storms, asteroid impacts, etc.), as well as estimates of damage from unforeseen events such as earthquakes and associated tsunamis, industrial disasters, monster attacks, or alien invasions, usually within minutes of their occurrence. Using computer models created by KAC R&D for estimating nuclear weapons effects, as well as techniques developed for use in predicting damage in Japan from attacks by ゴジラ(Godzilla), モスラ (Mothra), and particularly メカゴジラ (Mechagodzilla), the damages and losses resulting from this weekend’s invasion by the Chitauri have been estimated. 

KAC expects the physical damage from the invasion to be $60 to $70 Billion Dollars, with secondary economic impacts from cleanup, loss of business, disruptions to commerce and services, etc. causing an additional $90 Billion dollars. Casualties are undoubtedly in the high thousands. Therefore, we estimate the total economic impact to be at least $160 Billion dollars. This compares with the direct impact from
the September 11th 2001 attacks of $30 Billion dollars (total impact $83 Billion). For additional context, comparable disasters include the 2011 Tōhoku Earthquake and Tsunami ($122 Billion), the 1995 Kobe Earthquake ($140 Billion), and Hurricane Katrina at over $90 Billion. 

Damage Assessment and Discussion
A combination of satellite imagery, documentary footage, and news reports were used for the damage assessment. The pre-event exposure was derived from KAC’s spring 2012, US High Resolution infrastructure database. The island of Manhattan contains some of the most valuable and densely populated property in the world. Within one mile of the invasion site is over $40 Billion Dollars of residential property, and at least 10 times that amount of commercial property. 

Although at least two dozen buildings suffered extensive structural damage or collapse during the attack and defense of the city, most of the damage appeared to be to windows, facades and exterior features of the buildings. For buildings that did not suffer significant structural failure or penetration by the fighting, interior contents damage should be limited. However, damage to the upper levels of a large number of buildings will be costly and time consuming to repair, as the number of companies equipped to undertake such efforts is limited. Price gouging and demand surge, the inflation in prices due to limited supplies and significant damage in a local area, may be a problem if state and local officials are not vigilant. 

Numerous vehicles were damaged or destroyed during the attack, as well as significant infrastructure such as roads and bridges. The extensive damage to Grand Central Terminal could prove highly disruptive,depending on the sub-surface damage to the subway system. Although such damage appeared unlikely, as the 9/11 events showed, collapsing buildings can cause significant damage to sub- surface infrastructure such as gas, communications, and electrical systems. Detailed site surveys will be required to assess the state of the subterranean infrastructure. 

As noted in the estimate, recovery costs are likely to be greater than direct costs, especially debris cleanup and removal. Cleanup from monster attacks and alien invasions often have complications not found in natural catastrophes. Although hazardous waste is always a factor in post-event cleanup (such as the significant contamination from damage to industrial facilities after Katrina),  the radioactive and chemical contamination in a post-invasion environment are often extreme. The Chitauri themselves, being organic, almost certainly constitute a bio-hazard and the cleanup of their remains will have to be conducted with appropriate decontamination protocols. 

Financing, Insurance and Liability Issues 
Immediate expenses such as cleanup and casualty assistance will have to be borne by various government agencies and private individuals. The impacts on local, state, and federal budgets are likely to be severe in the short term. The insurance industry will no doubt provide some immediate assistance for public relations reasons if nothing else; however, the ultimate costs of rebuilding and how those costs are allocated are highly contract specific. Most insurance policies have special provisions for acts of war, civil unrest, or terrorism. Given the involvement of individuals considered deities in some cultures (Thor, Loki), there is even the potential to classify the event as an “Act of God”, although that designation would be subject to strenuous theological and legal debate. Many policies have special provisions or exclusions for acts of war or terrorism. After the September 2001 attacks, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was passed to provide a federal “backstop” for insurance claims related to acts of terrorism. TRIA will no doubt come into play over this event. At this time the exact breakdown of Federal, State, local, and private costs is difficult to assess. With previous catastrophic loss events there was often a scramble to transfer liability between the various parties. 

As a quasi-governmental organization, S.H.I.E.L.D. is in all likelihood protected from liability through sovereign immunity. While gratitude over repelling the invasion will persist in the short term, in the longer term the events leading up to the opening of the portal will in all likelihood be examined in detail, and that immunity probed for legal weakness (recall the regulatory and legal consequences to the Ghostbusters over the Gozer incident of 1984). In addition, there was considerable collateral damage of questionable necessity by at least one of the S.H.I.E.L.D. operatives (Hulk). Given the dollar amounts involved, the litigiousness of American society, and the high density of skilled attorneys surviving in the New York City area, the exact classification of this event, financial liability, and ultimate responsibility will no doubt be subject to extensive litigation for many years to come.